![]() |
No home, no justice? The legal needs of homeless people (2005) Cite this reportCh 3. Homelessness in NSW |
‘Youth career’ pathway
The ‘youth career’ pathway focuses on young people leaving home before they have the capacity to live independently. The move out of home tends to be precipitated by family conflict. This may involve conflict between the young person and the parent(s) about behavioural boundaries or particular issues (e.g. the young person’s sexuality) or arise from family violence, abuse or neglect. Hoogland observed:
The reasons given by young people for seeking SAAP assistance are consistent with this pathway. During 2002–03, ‘relationship/family breakdown’ was cited as the main reason for seeking SAAP support in nearly 17% of support periods given to young men and 21% of those to young women aged under 25. Other main reasons for seeking support given by men and women under age 25 were:
Adult pathways: housing crisis career
The housing crisis pathway acknowledges the fundamental role of poverty and escalating debt in causing homelessness.116 In the households from which these homeless people come, the main income earner tends to be either outside the labour market or long-term unemployed.117 The shift to homelessness may be very sudden, facilitated, for instance, by illness or injury, family breakdown, unmanaged debt, loss of employment and no resources to accommodate this situation. As Mackenzie and Chamberlain note, “once adults lose their accommodation there is a sharp break and their problems usually get worse. Many move into the homeless population for a sustained period of time and some adapt to homelessness as a ‘way of life’”.118
MacKenzie and Chamberlain suggest that this pathway probably accounts for the largest proportion of the homeless population. This contention is supported by SAAP data.
The following reasons were prominent among the most commonly cited ‘main reasons’ clients sought support from NSW SAAP services in 2002–03:
When people leave home due to family breakdown, Mackenzie and Chamberlain report that there is commonly a period when people move in and out of their family home a number of times, particularly when domestic violence is involved.120 Support agencies are often not notified of the problems until the situation is very serious.121 By this stage, crisis responses to find accommodation become the priority.
Again this pathway is reflected in the ‘main reasons’ provided by clients for seeking SAAP accommodation. In 2002–03, domestic violence was the most frequently cited ‘main reason’ for seeking SAAP support in NSW (18% of all support periods), with ‘relationship/ family breakdown’ accounting for a further 11% of support periods and ‘time out from family/other situation’ cited as the main reason in a further 5% of support periods. However, domestic violence was the main reason for seeking assistance in 39% of support periods to women alone aged over 25 and in 51% of support periods to women with children.122 While these figures are high, they may still underestimate the extent of domestic violence among women leaving home.
Transition from youth to adult homelessness
A third point of entry to adult homelessness is the transition from youth homelessness. While there is some evidence that early intervention to get young people to return home or to find appropriate alternative accommodation may be working,125 some young homeless people remain homeless into their adult lives. Mackenzie and Chamberlain found that by the time these young people make the transition to adult homelessness, many have issues with drugs, alcohol or mental health, have had contact with Juvenile Justice, are unemployed, and are extremely poor and marginalised. Thus, at this point, they require intensive support. However, intervention at this late stage is less likely to be successful.126
Finally, it should be noted that there is considerable overlap between each of the different ‘pathways’. For instance, for many people the experience of family breakdown will be tied up with financial hardship and the loss of accommodation. Generally, however, the consultations with service providers and homeless people in the current study, as well as the published data and academic literature, support the type of framework identified by MacKenzie and Chamberlain.