![]() | ![]() |
On the edge of justice: the legal needs of people with a mental illness ( 2006 ) Cite this reportCh 3. Legal issuesDisability discrimination |
This is supported by the Productivity Commission, which recommends that the “Disability Discrimination Act 1992 be amended to include a general duty by employers to make reasonable adjustments”.57 For example, an employer should “work with the individual and put in place prevention approaches … and only where those fail and there is a persistent occupational health and safety risk to then consider termination”.58 Without such a duty, the commission states that discrimination would not be adequately addressed.59
An example of the interplay between discrimination and occupational health and safety is the reported exclusion of people with a mental illness who have complex needs and behaviours from the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program (SAAP). This program is a jointly funded Australian government and state/territory program that provides supported, temporary accommodation to people experiencing homelessness.60 In the Foundation’s No Home, No Justice? report, concerns were raised by stakeholders that people with complex needs (such as mental health and drug and alcohol problems) were being excluded from SAAP services because of concerns for the occupational health and safety of SAAP employees.61
In its inquiry into the exclusion of people with complex needs from SAAP services, the NSW Ombudsman recommended that SAAP services should move away from a “presumption of risk to considered assessment and risk management”, whereby “policies, procedures and practices are inclusive, and that any exclusions be based on considered assessment of the presenting circumstances of individual clients and fair and transparent exiting procedures”.62