ContentJust Search pageLJF site navigationLeft navigation links
LJF Logo
Publications sectionJustice Awards sectionResearch sectionGrants sectionPlain language law section
Just Search
 

C. Final Grant Report


You must submit the Final Grant Report when you finish the grant project, an example of which is set out below.

The report is divided into two sections — Part A and Part B.

Part A

For external use and includes a description of the project, the evaluation and recommendations. Information in Part A may be published to the Foundation’s web site.

Part B

Only for your organisation and the Foundation’s information, it will not be made public or published to the Foundation’s website. This part is for your reflections on lessons learned as a result of running the project, budget, staffing and project management issues.

For small grants — the Final Grant Report would typically be two (2) to five (5) pages long (plus attachments).

For general grants — the Final Grant Report would typically be five (5) to ten (10) pages long (plus attachments).


FINAL GRANT REPORT

PART A — EXTERNAL

Description of the project

Describe the project in just enough detail so that anyone can understand what the aim of the project was and what strategies were undertaken to achieve that aim.

The project — what happened?

How did the project come about?

What were the project stages?

What happened in each stage?

How did it vary from what was intended?

Evaluation

What were the evaluation questions?

What data was gathered?

What answers were found?

Conclusions and recommendations

Key findings

Conclusions

Recommendations for improvement?

What are your recommendations for future projects?

PART B — INTERNAL

Budget

What resources were required (e.g. staff, volunteers, budget)?

Were the allocated resources sufficient?

What did you learn?

About the process of the project (such as project management, timing, etc)

Was it onerous to follow the grant conditions (best practice processes)

Comments on the Steering Committee — how useful was it?

About the evaluation process?

What was valuable/useful or not valuable/useful about the evaluation process?

What you would do differently?

Comments about the grants process?

ATTACHMENTS

Project materials (such as publications, DVDs, CD ROM, booklets, flyers, etc)

Supporting evidence for evaluation (such as survey results, user testing, etc)

Qualitative interview data

Process documentation (such as working party minutes, etc)


CLOSE